Subject-object and subject-subject relationships of components in information systems during the interaction between youth and authorities

In today's digital civilization, the interaction between youth and government through automated plat-forms has become an important topic. For instance, the socialization of young people occurs, among other things, through various channels, including mass media, gadgets, the internet, and others. These channels shape moral values, attitudes, civic positions, and societal preferences. In this context, the government acts as one of the subjects of social interactions. With the widespread integration of artificial intelligence, digital government platforms can become a subject of interaction with youth, performing the same functions to government structures. This article justifies this thesis, for which the authors provide the results of a systematic analysis of the transformation from subject-object relationships between youth and government automated information plat-forms to subject-subject interactions. The study provides an opportunity to present the concept of subjectivity within an information system, highlighting its main characteristics, input and output parameters, and the algorithms and structures necessary to organization interactive interaction with young people.

There is an analogy between the relationships of programmers and software, and the relationships be-tween young people and websites, platforms, and mobile applications. In both cases, both parties act as active agents influencing each other. In both cases, both parties act as active subjects influencing each other. The authors argue that, in such cases, a well-prepared automated platform equipped with artificial intelligence module, can serve as one of the actors in the political socialization of today's youth, who are essentially a digital generation. This opens up opportunities to more effectively utilize digital government platforms in shaping strategies for youth participation in the political life of Russian society. Of course, the knowledge base of these automated platforms must be initially prepared using the current regulatory and legislative framework, as well as the established categories of moral values and social norms.

The study the authors did allows correcting the architecture of digital interactive applications in such a way, to transform them from simple search engines and information gatherers into active subjects of youth socialization — personal mentors capable of guiding the formation of their life trajectories.

1. Arestova, O. N., Babanin, L. N., & Voyskunskiy, A. E. (1996). Communication in computer networks: psychological determinants and consequences. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 4(4), pp. 14-20. (In Russian).

2. Maiorov, A. A. (2015). Information objects in the information field. Educational Resources and Technologies, (1(9)), pp. 66-73. (In Russian).

3. Dyachkov, A. A., & Gordeeva, P. A. (2022). The problem of subjectivity in psychological knowledge. Vestnik of Minin University, 10(3(40)), p. 16. (In Russian). DOI: 10.26795/2307-1281-2022-10-3-16

4. Volkova, E. N. (2005). Subjectness as active relation to self, to other people and to the world. The world of psychology, (3(43)), pp. 33-40. (In Russian).

5. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K. A. (1999). Psikhologiya i soznanie lichnosti. (Problemy metodologii, teorii i issledovaniya real'noy lichnosti): izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy. Moscow, Moskovskiy psikhologo-sotsialnyy institut Publ. ; Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 218 p. (In Russian).

6. Brushlinskiy, A. V. (1996). Psikhologiya sub''ekta v izmenyayushchemsya obshchestve. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 17(6), pp. 30-41. (In Russian).

7. Brushlinskiy, A. V. (2008). Sub''ekt: myshlenie, uchenie, voobrazhenie: izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy. Moscow, Moskovskiy psikhologo-sotsialnyy institut Publ. ; Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 406 р. (In Russian).

8. Vasil'eva, E. I. (2019). Innovatsionnye formy uchastiya molodezhi v protsesse prinyatiya politicheskikh resheniy. Molodezh' XXI veka: obraz budushchego: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem XIII Kovalevskie chteniya. Saint Petersburg, Skifiya-print Publ., рр. 149-150. (In Russian).

9. Gulyaev, I. I. (2016). Sovremennye osobennosti politicheskoy sotsializatsii kak krizis politicheskogo uchastiya molodezhi. Upravlenie v XXI veke: sbornik trudov Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Belgorod, ID "Belgorod" Publ., pp. 72-75. (In Russian).

10. Parfenova, Yu. V. (2016). New forms of political participation under the conditions of a knowledge-based society. Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University. Political Science. International Relations, (2), рр. 63-71. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu06.2016.20663

11. Bogomolova, T. Yu., & Shcherbakova, D. M. (2021). Onlayn-petitsii kak sposob kommunikatsii naseleniya i vlasti v tsifrovuyu epokhu. Kommunikatsiya v sotsial'nogumanitarnom znanii, ekonomike, obrazovanii: materialy V mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoprakticheskoy konferentsii. Minsk, Belorusskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., pp. 11-17. (In Russian).

12. Tapscott, D. (1999). Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York, McGraw-Hill Companies, 336 p. (In English).

13. Insights. Ideas. Inspiration. (In English). Available at: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/

14. Vershinina, M. A. (2021). Digital channels of interaction between government and society: new communication practices and selection, (87), pp. 61-71. (In Russian). Available at: https://doi.org/10.24412/2070-1381-2021-87-61-71

15. Kiselev, V. G., Barbakov, O. M., & Zobnin, Yu. A. (2015). Sotsial'naya inzheneriya v sisteme upravleniya predpriyatiya. Tyumen, Industrial University of Tyumen Publ., 68 p. (In Russian).

16. Barbakov, O. M., Belonozhko L. N. (2017). Modeling of mass media influence on formation of personality in virtual space. Man in India, 97(3), pp. 211-222. (In English).

17. Konev, Yu. M., Belonozhko, M. L., & Barbakov, O. M. (2013). Effektivnost' vzaimodeystviya vlastnykh struktur i sel'skogo naseleniya Tyumenskoy oblasti (po rezul'tatam sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya). Modernizatsionnyy potentsial i sotsial'nye praktiki - osnova konkurentosposobnosti i konsolidatsii rossiyskikh regionov: materialy III Tyumenskogo sotsiologicheskogo foruma. Tyumen, Tyumen Regional Duma, Industrial University of Tyumen, pp. 133-137. (In Russian).

18. Smirnova, O. P., Barbakov, O. M., Ponomareva, A. O., & Vinogradova, M. V. (2019). Modeling of the Innovation Activity of Russia’s Regions. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 16, pp. 403-413. (In Russian).

19. Abramova, S. B., & Antonova, N. L. (2024). Digital interaction between youth and authorities: motivation and barriers. Sociology of science and technology, 15(2), pp. 100-121. (In Russian).

20. Derevyanchenko, A. A., & Kalinin, D. V. (2020). Outh political activity in digital society. Citizen. Elections. Authority, 2(16), pp. 155-173. (In Russian).