Socio-economic theories of territorial development management
https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2022-2-9-22
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of theoretical aspects of the management of the development of spaces and territories. To clarify the conceptual approaches, the main ideas are classified according to the provisions specific to each scientific field (sociology, economics, geography, etc.). The synthesis of the characteristics of the category "development management" allows you to focus on the most significant approaches of each science. Among the determinants of the theories there are adaptive management and human potential development (sociology); innovative economy of a single space; the climatic and natural potential of the area (social geography). It is concluded that the unifying beginning of the complex research process of the stated problem is the effective application of social management methods.
Keywords
adaptive management,
concept,
paradigm,
space,
development,
region,
social sphere,
territory,
theory
About the Authors
M. L. Belonozhko
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina L. Belonozhko - Department of Marketing and Government Administration.
Tyumen
G. I. Gerasimova
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina I. Gerasimova – Department of Marketing and Government Administration.
Tyumen
I. E. Pinigin
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivan E. Pinigin - Department of Marketing and Government Administration.
Tyumen
References
1. Dubrovskikh, A. A. (2015). Classical logic of removal and non-classical logic of complementarity. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, (9-2(59)), рр. 72-75. (In Russian).
2. Borodkin, V. V. (1991). Problemy otritsaniya i razvitie. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 181 p. (In Russian).
3. Gorkin, A. P. (2013). Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaya geografiya: ponyatiya i terminy: slovar'-spravochnik. Smolensk, Oykumena Publ., 328 р. (In Russian).
4. Hegel, G. W. F. (1840). Encyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. Erster Theil. Die Logik. (In German).
5. Kareev, N. N. (2011). Istoriologiya. Teoriya istoricheskogo protsessa. Moscow, LIBROKOM Publ., 328 p. (In Russian).
6. Shumpeter, J. A. (2003). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. (In German).
7. Husserl, E. (2000). Logical research. Cartesian reflections The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. The crisis of European humanity and philosophy. Philosophy as a strict science. Minsk, Moscow, AST Publ., рр. 290-323. (In Russian).
8. Subbotina, T. V. (2017). Gnoseological and ontological aspects of territorial natural-social systems. Geographical bulletin, (2(41)), рр. 31-42. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17072/2079-7877-2017-2-31-42
9. Pirogov, S. V. (2012). Conceptual models of management development of the city. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, (1(17)), рр. 114-128. (In Russian).
10. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), pp. 1002-1037. (In English). DOI: 10.1086/261420
11. Boulding, K. E. (2002). Economic science and social systems. Panorama of economic thought at the end of the 20th century: in 2 volumes. St. Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., pp. 907-927. (In Russian).
12. Smit, A. (1863). Inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations Classics of Political Economy. (In English).
13. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London, Palgrave Macmillan, 472 p. (In Russian).
14. Fridman, M., & Fridman, R. (1980). Free Choose: A Personal Statement. New York. (In English).
15. Drozdova, Yu. A. (2019). Resource approach in studying territorial communities. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 10(1), рр. 82-103. (In Russian). DOI: 10.19181/vis.2019.28.1.557
16. Subetto, A. I. (2016). Sistemogeneticheskaya paradigma teorii vremeni i prostranstva. St. Petersburg, Asterion Publ., 60 p. (In Russian).
17. Giddens, E. (2005). Ustroenie obshchestva: ocherki teorii strukturatsii. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 528 p. (In Russian).
18. Parsons, T. (2002). O sotsial'nykh sistemakh. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 832 p.
19. Zubarevitch, N. V. (2010). Cities as centers of modernization of economy and human capital. Social Science and Contemporary World, (5), рр. 5-19. (In Russian).
20. Kuznetsov, O. L., Kuznetsov, P. G., & Bol'shakov, B. E. (2000). Sistema priroda - obshchestvo - chelovek: ustoychivoe razvitie. Moskva, Dubna, Noosfera Publ., 390 p. (In Russian).
21. Krasnova, L. V. (2006). Social clustering as a field of communal co-participation. Tambov University Review: Series Humanities, (3-1(43)), рр. 229-234. (In Russian).
22. Makar, S. V. (2015). Prostranstvennye struktury aglomeratsionnogo tipa: klastery. Vneekonomicheskie faktory prostranstvennogo razvitiya. Moscow, Eslan Publ., рр. 189-198. (In Russian).
23. Lappo, G. M. (1997). Geografiya gorodov. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 480 p. (In Russian).
24. Tyurbeev, O. G. (2018). Institutsional'nye faktory razvitiya regiona (na primere respubliki Kalmykiya). Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava, (8), рр. 232-237. (In Russian).
25. Ovcharov, A. O., & Ovcharova, T. N. (2017). Kompleksnaya paradigma sotsial'nogo upravleniya. Politika i Obshchestvo, (8), pp. 130-143. (In Russian).
26. Kiritchuck, S. M., & Belonozhko, M. L. (2011). Subjects of local government in Russia. News from Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics, (4), рр. 20-23. (In Russian).
27. Granberg, A. G. (2003). Fundamentals of the regional economy. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki Publ., 495 p. (In Russian).
28. Kaganskiy, V. L. (2003). Osnovnye praktiki i paradigmy rayonirovaniya. Regional'nye issledovaniya, (1(2)), pp. 17-30. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Belonozhko M.L., Gerasimova G.I., Pinigin I.E. Socio-economic theories of territorial development management. Proceedings from higher educational institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics. 2022;15(2):9-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2022-2-9-22
Views:
9
Email this article 