Preview

Proceedings from higher educational institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics

Advanced search

Corporate social responsibility in the context of supporting families with children or planning to have children

https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2025-1-38-47

EDN: XZVEOF

Abstract

This article explores corporate social responsibility in the context of supporting employees who have children or plan to have them. In light of the demographic crisis in Russia, particularly in Russia, particularly in the Omsk Oblast, this study examines the initiatives of large companies that have developed social support programs for family-oriented employees. The primary focus is on analyzing successful case studies aimed at increasing birth rates by creating conditions that allow employees to balance work and family life. The study reveals that, despite the economic incentives included in state policies, the main issue of the demographic crisis remains unresolved. The demographic situation is further exacerbated by economic problems, a declining number of reproductive women, and uncertainty in the labor market. For this reason, the article suggests engaging businesses in supporting families as a sustainable solution to increase birth rates and improve employees' quality of life. Modern labor market research confirms a shortage of young professionals, presenting employers with the challenge in retaining and motivating their personnel. The labor market competition index in various Russian regions remains low. Furthermore, the high migration rate of skilled workers from these areas aggravates the staff shortage, especially in the industrial and manufacturing sectors. The article provides examples of company programs from organizations such as "Norilsk Nickel", "Transneft" and "MMK". These programs include support measures like material assistance, favorable conditions for large families, and medical and educational services for employees' children. The study demonstrates that these measures, aimed at reinforcing family values, can increase employee loyalty and productivity. Recruitment agencies report that in Omsk the cost of adapting a new employee can exceed 90,000 rubles. Programs of major companies not only serve to motivate employees but also create stable conditions for families, thereby reducing turnover and stabilizing work teams. Thus, based on modern statistical data, this article confirms that implementing social support programs for employees with family responsibilities has a significant positive impact on both the demographic situation and various business performance indicators.

About the Author

O. V. Gokova
Dostoevsky Omsk State University
Russian Federation

Olga V. Gokova, Candidate of Sociology, Associate Professor at the Department of Regional Economics and Human Resource Management

Omsk



References

1. Putin, V. V. (2024). Otkrytie Goda sem'i v Rossii. (In Russian). Available at: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/73297 (accessed 20.11.2024).

2. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossijskoу Federatsii ot 28 noyabrya 2024 g. № 1014 «Ob ocenke effektivnosti deyatel'nosti vysshih dolzhnostnyh lic sub"ektov RossijskoуFederatsii i deyatel'nosti ispolnitel'nyh organov sub"ektov Rossijskoу Federatsii». (In Russian). Available at: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_491669/(accessed 02.12.2024).

3. Estestvennoe dvizhenie naseleniya Rossijsk oу Federatsii za 2023 god. (In Russian). Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/11110/document/13269 (accessed 02.12.2024).

4. Golikova: rossijskie sem'i za 20 let stali poluchat' v 10 raz bol'she finansovoj podderzhki. (In Russian). Available at: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/19919339 (accessed28.11.2024).

5. Tat'yana Golikova: za 20 let ohvat semej merami finansovoj podderzhki vyros v 10 raz. (In Russian). Available at: http://government.ru/news/50819/(accessed 02.12.2024).

6. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility : Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders // Business Horizons, 34 (4), pp. 39-48. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G

7. Shubat, O. M., Bagirova, A. P., Yan, D. (2022).Corporate family-friendly policies: the possibility of implementation in russian regions. Economy of regions, 18(4), рр. 1121-1134. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-4-11

8. Rostovskaya, T. K., Shabunova, A. A., & Bagirova, A. P. (2021). The concept for corporate demographic policy of Russian enterprises in the framework of corporate social responsibility. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 14(5), рр. 151-164. (In Russian). DOI : 10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.9.

9. Kalachikova, O. N. & Gruzdeva, M. A. (2019). Gender stereotypes in the modern family: women and men: On the basis of a sociological research. Woman in Russian Society, (1(90)), рр. 64-76. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2019.1.6

10. Nausheen, H., Mahmood, Y., Imran, M., & Ahmad, Z. (2022). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Value Creation: The Mediating Role of Innovative Performance. Journal of Management Practices, Humanities and Social Sciences, 6 (4), pp. 92-103. (In English). DOI: 10.33152/jmphss-6.4.10

11. Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Engagement: Enabling Employees to Employ More of Their Whole Selves at Work. Frontiers in Psychology, (7), р. 796. (In English). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00796

12. Ibrahim, I., Makaryanawati, M., & Juliardi, D. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Firm Innovation. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 4(2), pp. 766-781. (In English). DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v4i2.243

13. Kushakova, M. N. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: experience of foreign countries. Ekonomika i socium, 9(88), pp. 900-905. (In Russian).

14. Vovchenko, N. G., & Andreeva, O. V. (2021). Development of corporate social responsibility in modern economic conditions. Social entrepreneurship and corporate social responsibility, 2(4), pp. 233-248. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18334/social.2.4.113593

15. Tobysheva, A. A., & Shubat, O. M. (2024). Corporate demographic policy: determinants and practices. Human Progress, 10(1), P. 6. (In Russian). DOI: 10.34709/IM.1101.6

16. Zhang, L. (2012). Board demographic diversity, independence, and corporate social performance. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 12(5), pp. 686-700. (In English). DOI: 10.1108/14720701211275604

17. Bagirova, A. P., & Vavilova, A. S. (2021). Supporting demographic policy: evaluations and opportunities. Human Progress, 7(2), Р. 3 (In Russian). DOI: 10.34709/IM.172.3. Available at: http://progresshuman.com/images/2021/Tom7_2/Bagirova.pdf.


Review

For citations:


Gokova O.V. Corporate social responsibility in the context of supporting families with children or planning to have children. Proceedings from higher educational institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics. 2025;18(1):38-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2025-1-38-47. EDN: XZVEOF

Views: 23


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1993-1824 (Print)