Preview

Proceedings from higher educational institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics

Advanced search

The concept of state sovereignty in the context of the transformation of the modern world order

https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2022-3-35-49

Abstract

The article focuses on the issue of changing the status of a modern national state in the context of a global transformation of socio-economic and political relations. Much attention is given to studying the process of evolution of the concept of state sovereignty, which is based on the right of the state to independently conduct its own domestic and foreign policy. Particular attention is paid to the reasons for adjusting the principles of the theory of state sovereignty at the modern stage of the development of society. It is concluded that sovereignty is dialectical as a combination of centrifugal trends, when regional and local authorities are strengthened, their competencies and centripetal trends are expanded. They are expressed in the voluntary restriction by some states of their sovereign rights in favor of international organizations. It is argued that the confrontation of two tendencies is to limit sovereignty on the one hand and to strengthen it on the other hand. It will determine the world order in the foreseeable future, being a source of international tension from time to time.

About the Authors

M. S. Zhuleva
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Maria S. Zhuleva, Department of Humanities and Technologies

Tyumen



Yu. M. Konev
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Yury M. Konev, Department of Marketing and Government Administration

Tyumen



References

1. Mybarakshin, R. R. (2020). Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii s izmeneniyami, vynesennymi na Obshcherossiyskoe golosovanie 1 iyulya 2020 goda (+ sravnitel'naya tablitsa izmeneniy). Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 96 p. (In Russian).

2. Mikheev, V. A. (2020). State sovereignty: political aspects of its providing, problems and prospects. Vlast', (28( 6)), pp. 308-314. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v28i6.7803

3. Grachev, N. D. (2011). Idea of the sovereignty in space of a modern society: sociallyphilosophical aspect. Izvestiya of Saratov university. New series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 11(3), рр. 3-6. (In Russian).

4. Solovyov, E. G. (2014). Geopolitical shifts in the modern world in the context of the evolution of the concept of sovereignty. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science, (3), pp. 57-73. (In Russian).

5. Filonova, M. B. (2010). Crisis of state sovereignty idea: philosophic-legal aspect. Philosophy of Law, (5), pp. 111-115. (In Russian).

6. Asonov, N. V. (2020). The specificity of the contemporary Russia sovereignty: the interpretation problem. Vlast', (6), pp. 318-320. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v28i6.7805

7. Akhverdyan, G. K. (2010). Issue of sovereignty in modern politological discourse. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg university. International Relations, (1), pp. 53-57. (In Russian).

8. Kokoshin, A. A. (2006). Real'nyj suverenitet v sovremennoj miropoliticheskoj sisteme. 3rd edition, revised and expanded. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 180 p. (In Russian).

9. Panarin, A. S. (2003). Postmodernism and globalization. Voprosy Filosofii, (6), pp. 16-36. (In Russian).

10. Sergunin, A. A. (2010). Suverenitet: sovremennye diskussii v teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. Belgorod State University scientific bulletin history. Political Science (19(90)), рр. 231-236. (In Russian).

11. Korenyushkina, S. I., & Solov'ev, K. A. (2015). Suverenitet v epohu globalizacii: teoriya i praktika. Society. Environment. Development, (1(34)), pp. 55-59. (In Russian).

12. Kuznetsova, E. S. (2011). Problema ogranicheniya suvereniteta v mirovoj politike. Avtoref. diss. … kand. polit. nauk. Moscow, 24 p. (In Russian).

13. Grachev, N. I. (2009). Gosudarstvennoe ustrojstvo i suverenitet v sovremennom mire: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. diss. … dokt. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 43 р. (In Russian).

14. Khalatov, A. R. (2006). Suverenitet kak gosudarstvenno-pravovoj institute. Avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 29 р. (In Russian).

15. United Nations Charter. (In English). Available at: http://www.un.org.ru/sections/ uncharter/chapter-i/index.html

16. Zhuleva, M. S. (2015). Morals problem in the international relations. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics, (1), pp. 91-94. (In Russian).

17. Narochnitskaya, N. A. (2011). Democracy of the XXI century : the degeneration of meaning and values. (In English). Available at: http://analyticsmz.ru/?p=134

18. Sheremet'ev, D. V. (2019). Megatrends in the development of the modern world system and the security interests of Russia. Vlast', (27(1)), рр. 133-141. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i1.6240

19. Alekseev, G. V., & Morozov, G. N. (2017). The nationalization of the political class as an instrument of providing state security. Vlast', 25(6), pp. 88-94. (In Russian).

20. Krutakov, L. V. (2019). The contours of a new world order: changing the principles and rules of competition for energy resources. Vlast', 27(3), рр. 28-33. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i3.6398

21. Dyagilev, V. V., & Shevchenko, O. V. (2019). Globalism and national ideology. Vlast'. 27(4), pp. 133-137. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v27i4.6617

22. Chernyshov, A. G. (2017). The modern state: the last Leviathan, a phantom or the messiah? Vlast', 25(5), рр. 57-67. (In Russian).

23. Konyshev, V. N. (2010). Amerikanskij neorealizm o probleme suvereniteta. Political expertise: POLITEX, 6(4), рр. 68-88. (In Russian).

24. Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 264 p. (In English).

25. Habermas, J. (1996). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 404 p. (In German).

26. Etzioni, A. (2004). From empire to community. New York, 259 p. (In English).

27. Kapchan, Ch., & Maunt, A. (2009). Avtonomnoe upravlenie. (In Russian). Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/avtonomnoe-upravlenie

28. Degot'kova, I. (2022). Rosstat nazval chislo zhivushchih za chertoj bednosti rossiyan. (In Russian). Available at: https://www.rbc.ru/economics/11/03/2022/622b53209a7947ef35d91afb

29. O natsional'nykh tselyakh i strategicheskikh zadachakh razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii na period do 2024 goda. (2018). (In Russian). Available at: https:www.kremlin. ru/acts/bank/43027

30. Kokoshin, A. A. (2017). Methodological issues of assesing national security. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya, (11(403)), pp. 20-29. (In Russian). DOI: 10.7868/S0132162517110034


Review

For citations:


Zhuleva M.S., Konev Yu.M. The concept of state sovereignty in the context of the transformation of the modern world order. Proceedings from higher educational institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics. 2022;15(3):35-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2022-3-35-49

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1993-1824 (Print)