Changing self-preservation behavior (a case study of the period of the COVID-19 pandemic)
https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2023-1-20-40
Abstract
Social distancing, social isolation and self-isolation, which swept the world in 2020, had a serious impact on the perception of the surrounding reality by an individual. Behavioral structures and individual behavior have changed, especially in relation to individual's own health. Studies by foreign authors prove that in many respects physical health during the pandemic turned out to depend on psychological factors, changes in people's habits. The pandemic period opened up completely new problems for Russian society that had not been given so much attention previously. Many of the problems turned out to be insufficiently or completely unexplored. One of such problems was the lack of readiness of the social system for new challenges; in particular, the optimal elements of self-preservation behavior of Russians were not determined. The population of Russia showed a clear unpreparedness both for the very fact of self-isolation and for effective self-preservation behavior. The COVID-19 pandemic had a huge impact on the exacerbation of chronic diseases, the constant postponement of their treatment. The level of responsibility for oneself and one's own health are key indicators that interest researchers in the problem of self-preservation behavior during the pandemic. The aim of the study was to analyze the theory of the question of changing aspects of self-preservation behavior in difficult life periods of an individual. To achieve the goal, the following tasks are set: to study self-preservation behavior as a survival factor, to consider self-preservation behavior in a social context, to highlight the key features of self-preservation behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. An analysis of scientific literature and secondary analysis of research were used as the following research methods. The results of the study are generalized data and ideas about the need to study the social management of self-preservation behavior during the pandemic. These results can be applied in the development of programs of sociological and psychological research, monitoring to study the characteristics of self-preservation behavior of individual socio-demographic groups of the population.
About the Author
R. B. BarahoevaRussian Federation
Rumina B. Barahoeva, Department of Marketing and Government Administration
Tyumen
References
1. Champion, V. L., & Skinner, C. S. (2008). The health belief model. Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp. 45-65. (In English).
2. Oskolkov, A. V. (2020). Sotsial'naya politika RF v usloviyakh pandemii. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya, (65-3), pp. 109-112. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18411/lj-09-2020-108
3. Bonacini, L., Gallo, G., & Patriarca, F. (2021). Identifying policy challenges of COVID-19 in hardly reliable data and judging the success of lockdown measures. Journal of Population Economics, 34(1), pp. 275-301. (In English). DOI: 10.1007/s00148-020-00799-x
4. Milani, F. (2021). COVID-19 outbreak, social response, and early economic effects: a global VAR analysis of cross-country interdependencies. Journal of Population Economics, 34(1), pp. 223-252. (In English). DOI: 10.1007/s00148-020-00792-4
5. Shao, W, & Hao, F. (2020). Confidence in political leaders can slant risk perceptions of COVID-19 in a highly polarized environment. Social Science & Medicine, 261, р. 113235. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113235
6. Levy, B. R, & Myers, L. M. (2004). Preventive health behaviors influenced by self-perceptions of aging. Preventive Medicine, 39(3), pp. 625-629. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.029
7. Baumeister, R. F., & Alquist, J. L. (2009). Self-regulation as a limited resource: Strength model of control and depletion. Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes. New York, Psychology Press, pp. 21-33. (In English).
8. Ryazantsev, S. V., Khramova, M. N., & Smirnov, A. V. (2021). The social demographic aspects of vaccination of population of Russia in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Problems of social hygiene, public health and history of medicine, 29(5), pp. 1047-1056. (In Russian). DOI: 10.32687/0869-866X-2021-29-5-1047-1056
9. Patsiorkovskiy, V. V. (2021). Osobennosti sovremennogo etapa mirovogo razvitiya: ot globalizatsii k pandemii. Rossiya: Tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya. Ezhegodnik. Vypusk 16. Moscow, (1), pp. 220-225. (In Russian).
10. Igoshev, M. V. (2013). Values system in self-preservation behaviour culture formation: conceptual approach. Historical, philosophical, political and law sciences, culturology and study of art. Issues of theory and practice, (9-1(35)), pp. 59-62. (In Russian).
11. Meier, K., Glatz, T., Guijt, M. C., Piccininni, M., Meulen, M., Atmar, K.,… Zamanipoor Najafabadi, A. H. (2020). Public perspective on protective measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, Germany and Italy: A survey study. PLOS One, 15(8), p. e0236917. (In English). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236917
12. Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227), pp. 912-920. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
13. Koller, T. (2009). Addressing the socio-economic determinants of adolescent health: experience from the WHO/HBSC Forum 2007. International Journal of Public Health, 54(S2), pp. 278-284. (In English). DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-5420-x
14. Holmes, E. A., O'Connor, R. C., Perry, V. H., Tracey, I., Wessely, S., Arseneault, L.,… Bullmore, E. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry, 7(6), pp. 547-560. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
15. Vatoropin, A. S., Latu, M. N., & Garaeva, E. I. (2021). Attitude of the Russians to self-isolation regime caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Management issues, (3(70)), рр. 62-79. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2021-3-62-79
16. Ivanov, V. N., & Patrushev, V. I. (1999). Social'nye tekhnologii. Moscow, Soyuz Publ., 431 p. (In Russian).
17. Qiu, Y., Chen, X., & Shi, W. (2020). Impacts of social and economic factors on the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Journal of Population Economics, 33(4), pp. 1127-1172. (In English). DOI: 10.1007/s00148-020-00778-2
18. Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality. Cambridge, p. 69. (In English). DOI: 10.3386/w26947
19. Pareek, M., Bangash, M. N., Pareek, N., Pan, D., Sze, Sh., Minhas, J. S.,… Khunti, K. (2020). Ethnicity and COVID-19: an urgent public health research priority. The Lancet, 395(10234), pp.1421-1422. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30922-3
20. Chen, Sh., Jones, P. B., Underwood, B. R., Moore, A., Bullmore, E. T., Banerjee, S.,… Cardinal, R. N. (2020). The early impact of COVID-19 on mental health and community physical health services and their patients’ mortality in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, UK. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 131, pp. 244-254. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.09.020
21. Mongey, S., Pilossoph, L., & Weinberg, A. (2020). Which workers bear the burden of social distancing policies? The Journal of Economic Inequality, 19(3), pp. 509-526. (In English). DOI: 10.1007/s10888-021-09487-6
22. Inan, F., Yukselturk, E., Kurucay, M., & Flores, R. (2017). The impact of self-regulation strategies on student success and satisfaction in an online course. International Journal on E-learning, 16(1), pp. 23-32. (In English).
23. Shimanovskaya, Ya. V. (2020). Self-preservation behavior of Moscow residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Management Issues, (5(66)), рр. 29-35. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2020-5-29-35
Review
For citations:
Barahoeva R.B. Changing self-preservation behavior (a case study of the period of the COVID-19 pandemic). Proceedings from higher educational institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics. 2023;16(1):20-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/1993-1824-2023-1-20-40